Investment Free Video

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Penn Teller 1st Amendment http://www.tvrage.com/Penn_And_Teller_Bullshit/

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

On October 16, 1991, Hennard drove his 1987 Ford Ranger pickup truck through the front window of a Luby's Cafeteria at 1705 East Central Texas Expressway in Killeen, yelled "This is what Bell County has done to me!", then opened fire on the restaurant's patrons and staff with a Glock 17 pistol and later a Ruger P89. About 80 people were in the restaurant at the time. He stalked, shot, and killed 23 people and wounded another 20 before committing suicide. During the shooting, he approached Suzanna Gratia Hupp and her parents. Hupp had actually brought a handgun to the Luby's Cafeteria that day, but had left it in her vehicle due to the laws in force at the time, forbidding citizens from carrying firearms. According to her later testimony in favor of Missouri's HB-1720 bill[1] and in general, after she realized that her firearm was not in her purse, but "a hundred feet away in [her] car", her father charged at Hennard in an attempt to subdue him, only to be gunned down; a short time later, her mother was also shot and killed. (Hupp later expressed regret for abiding by the law in question by leaving her firearm in her car, rather than keeping it on her person. One patron, Tommy Vaughn, threw himself through a plate-glass window to allow others to escape. Hennard allowed a mother and her four-year-old child to leave. He reloaded several times and still had ammunition remaining when he committed suicide by shooting himself in the head after being cornered and wounded by police. Reacting to the massacre, in 1995 the Texas Legislature passed a shall-issue gun law allowing Texas citizens with the required permit to carry concealed weapons. The law had been campaigned for by Suzanna Hupp, who was present at the Luby's massacre and both of whose parents were shot and killed. Hupp testified across the country in support of concealed-handgun laws, and was elected to the Texas House of Representatives in 1996. The law was signed by then-Governor George W. Bush and became part of a broad movement to allow U.S. citizens to easily obtain permits to carry concealed weapons.

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Complete video at: http://fora.tv/2007/09/11/Woody_Harrelson Actor Woody Harrelson discusses magazine publisher Larry Flynt, whose life Harrelson portrayed in the 1996 movie "The People vs. Larry Flynt," and his lasting impact on free speech in the United States. ----- The Oxonian Society presents a discussion with Woody Harrelson. Woody Harrelson is best known as the midwestern bartender, Woody Boyd, on the television series Cheers, for which he won an Emmy. Harrelson starred with Wesley Snipes in the hilarious comedy White Men Can't Jump. He then appeared in the controversial Indecent Proposal with Demi Moore and Robert Redford. Harrelson then went on to give a stunning performance as Mickey Knox in Oliver Stone’'s Natural Born Killers. He took the film world and press by storm again by starring opposite Courtney Love in The People vs. Larry Flynt. For his performance, he received a nomination for the Academy Award for Best Actor. When Terrence Malick resurfaced on the film scene, he immediately put Harrelson in The Thin Red Line, which was nominated for multiple Academy Awards. Other Harrelson films that were widely received by audiences around the World include North Country, Edtv and Wag the Dog. More recently, he had a fairly long run on the sitcom Will & Grace as Grace's love interest Nathan. Whatever film or television sitcom Harrelson appears, the audience is always guaranteed a provocative performance by an extremely talented and humble person. - The Oxonian Society Woodrow Tracy "Woody" Harrelson is an American Emmy Award winning and Academy Award nominated actor and activist. He was born on July 23, 1961 in Midland, TX.

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Watch the full show at http://www.theyoungturks.com.

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Due to the overwhelmingly long Colorado ballot this year, we decided to give a high brow, very sophisticated explanation of Amendment 49... in just 2 minutes.

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

This is Day 5 of our YouChoose '08 Spotlight week. Throughout this week we will be featuring a new video every day of presidential candidate Ron Paul talking about different issues. Please submit your questions, comments or your positions on the issues by posting your video comments on our video pages. (Posted August 5, 2007)

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Prior to the alleged ratification of the 14th Amendment, there was no legal definition of a "citizen of the United States", as everyone had primary citizenship in one of the several states. The Constitution referred to the sovereign state citizen, and no one else. Those who went to Washington, D.C. or outside the several states were commonly called "citizens of the United States." In the Constitution for the United States, the term was used to identify state citizens who were eligible under the suffrage laws to hold office, and they were required under the Constitution to have primary allegiance to one of the several states. Since that term was not specifically defined in the U.S. Constitution, Congress in 1868 took advantage of this term and utilized it in the so-called 14th Amendment to describe a NEW type of "citizen" whose primary allegiance was to the federal government, i.e. Washington, D.C. and not to one of the several states of the union. Thus, using the term as used in the U.S. Constitution to mislead and confuse the people as to the true intent and meaning of the Constitution. Many people have mistaken the citizen as denominated in the 14th Amendment to mean the same one in the original constitution, this is in error. The "citizen of the united states" as used in the constitution is not the same as the citizen of the United States used after the 14th Amendment. So all the elected officials are NOT sitting in the office constitutionally, they are merely impostors created by the 14th Amendment. The current President Clinton, is a U.S. citizen, and therefore not the "citizen of the united states" defined in the Constitution for the United States, neither the federal senators nor any congressmen are seated constitutionally. These facts being true, then all the federal laws are invalid for want of constitutionality. The 14th Amendment creates and defines citizenship of the United States. It had long been contended, and had been held by many learned authorities, and had never been judicially decided to the contrary, that there was no such thing as a citizen of the United States, except by first becoming a citizen of some state. United States v. Anthony (1874), 24 Fed. Cas. 829 (No. 14,459), 830. We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of the several states. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizens of its own who owe it allegiance, and whose rights, within its jurisdiction, it must protect. The same person may be at the same time a citizen of the United States and a citizen of a state, but his rights of citizenship under one of these governments will be different from those he has under the other. U. S. v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875). In other words, you do not have to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a state citizen. This was held to be true by the Maryland Supreme Court in 1966 wherein the state: Both before and after the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal Constitution, it has not been necessary for a person to be a citizen of the United States in order to be a citizen of his state. Crosse v. Bd. of Supvr,s of Elections, 221 A.2d. 431 (1966) The federal government was never given any authority to encroach upon the private affairs of the citizens in the several states of the union, unless they were involved in import or export activity, neither were they given authority to reach a citizen of Germany living in Germany. In fact, the states could refuse to enforce any act of congress, that they felt was outside the intent of the granting of limited powers to the federal government. This is called interposition or nullification. Several state supreme courts have in the past refused to uphold federal laws within their states. - Richard McDonald's state Citizen http://political-resources.com/jurisdiction/citizen.htm

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Joe Banister's explosive revelation - not only was the 16th Amendment NOT properly ratified by the required 3/4ths of the then 48 states of the United States, it was ratified by NONE of them. In fact, Kentucky was put down as having voted FOR the amendment, when in fact it had REJECTED it. The IRS relies on the 16th Amendment as justifying its tax-collecting powers. Since the 16th Amendment is void, so is the IRS. Thank you for revealing this, Joe Banister. Joe learned from Bill Benson, who has personally gone to each of the 48 states and has researched the actual voting records on the 16th Amendment. He has 17,000 historical documents showing that it was never ratified. A federal prosecutor offered Bill a deal - a great, high-paying job and an easy treatment on tax charges - if Bill agreed to turn over his 17,000 documents to the government (to hide the fact that the 16th Amendment was never passed).

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment04/ Some dumb Indiana Sheriff sits back and does absolutely nothing while an even dumber health inspector trespasses on private property without a warrant. I hope both these people got fired because this guy couldnt be more correct about his constitutional rights to privacy. Smart of him to get it all on film. _____________________________ Laporte County Health Dept Julie Wolfe 809 State St. Suite 401A Laporte, In 46350 (219)326-6808 ext 200. Fax (219)325-8628 DEPUTY CADE COOPER SERVING SINCE 2004 Address: 809 State Street Suite 202A LaPorte, Indiana 46350 Phone LaPorte Office Number: 219-326-7700 _________________________________________ Amendment IV (the Fourth Amendment) to the United States Constitution is one of the provisions included in the Bill of Rights. The Amendment guards against unreasonable searches and seizures, and was originally designed as a response to the controversial writs of assistance (a type of general search warrant), which were a significant factor behind the American Revolution. Toward that end, the amendment specifies that judicially sanctioned search and arrest warrants must be supported by probable cause and be limited in scope according to specific information supplied by a person (usually a peace officer) who has sworn by it and is therefore accountable to the issuing court. The amendment applies only to governmental actors; it does not guarantee to people the right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures conducted by private citizens or organizations. The Bill of Rights only restricts the power of the federal government, but the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that the Fourth Amendment is applicable to state governments by operation of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court has said that some searches and seizures may violate the Fourth Amendment's reasonableness requirement even if a warrant is supported by probable cause and is limited in scope. Conversely, the Court has approved routine warrantless seizures, for example "where there is probable cause to believe that a criminal offense has been or is being committed."

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Artist: FLAW Song: Amendment (live) Album: Through the Eyes Location: Washington D.C. 2002 Source: flawfans

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Reverend Billy and the Church of Stop Shopping Choir in a preview of a new Deep Dish series on Free Speech TV.

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Chuck Baldwin Presidential Candidate for the Constitution Party uses his 2nd Amendment Rights at 2 guns shops and shooting ranges in South Carolina. Learn more at: www.Baldwin08.Com 1-866-99-Baldwin

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

The Second Amendment

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

June 19, 2008 MSNBC Keith Olbermann

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Video of the twelveth mission in Hitman Blood Money; Amendment XXV. Difficulty - Professional

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Vampire Rights Amendment cartoon propaganda

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Penn & Teller on the 2nd Amendment

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Just A Quick Phone Call!

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

NEW VIDEOS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-EFMymr26fI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4kATMJUiz_8 ------------------------------------------ The White Knight - The New Hitman achieving Silent Assassin rate on Amendment XXV - Pro Difficulty **INCLUDES Hitman Series Soundtrack** 1st - Hitman: Codename 47 Title Music 2nd - Hitman :SA - H2 Action 3rd - Hitman: SA - End Boss

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

On July 9, 2008, 69 members of the U.S. Senate voted to abolish the 4th amendment and protect the President of the United States and his friends from illegal activities perpetrated upon the people of the United States in direct violation of the United States Constitution. 28 Senators voted NO. This is what some of them had to say about HR 6304. VIDEO SOURCE: http://www.WashingtonYoureFired.com --

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

This documentary short follows a 90 year old great-great grandmother on her trek to vote for Barack Obama in the 2008 Pennsylvania Primary. Having voted all her life, this is the first time she's had the opportunity to vote for a Black man for the office of President of the United States.

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

mission 12 this mission is easy like sunday MORNING

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

The Amendment song which kinda reminds me of a certain act. This comes from a certain show.

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

Judiciary Committee compels her testimony through court order...

Posted by Admin on Friday, 9 January, 2009 @

For those who miss former YouTube's Ron Paul girl Rachel (I do), here's her appearance on abc Talk Back, after the GOP debate in Iowa, asking about gun control laws. Guess who answers.